Changing The Policy of Fixed Orientation of PV Modules from Maximum Radiation to Maximum Saved CO2 Emissions of Thermal Power Plants

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 University of Shahid Beheshti, Tehran, Iran

2 Tehran, University of Shahid Beheshti

3 Tehran, Iran Grid Management Company

10.22059/jser.2022.346451.1250

Abstract

Generally, optimal fixed orientation of PV modules is supposed to be the one that receives maximum solar energy. To receive maximum energy, tilt angle is typically set on the latitude angle of the installation site and the module orients toward the south axis of earth. In other words, it is assumed that if the module orients toward the maximum point of solar energy absorption, maximum electrical energy is generated and maximum fossil fuel pollutants emitted from one sample thermal power plant to generate the equivalent electricity is saved. PV system orientation angle accuracy has the potential to avoid tonnes of GHG emissions without any investment, operation and maintenance costs. If the module is not placed in the proper orientation, the emitted pollutants of the sample plant would not be maximum. In this research, fuel type and efficiency of sample plants are considered as the prime factors in determining the optimal orientation.  The paper aims to show that the proper orientation for maximizing saved CO2 emissions of thermal power plants is not equal to the orientation of maximum radiation and the related tilt and azimuth angles are different.

Keywords

References

[1] Mamun, M., et al., Effect of tilt angle on the performance and electrical parameters of a PV module: Comparative indoor and outdoor experimental investigation. Energy and Built Environment, 2022. 3(3): p. 278-290.
[2] Gilbert, M.M., Renewable and efficient electric power systems. 2004, John Wiley & Sons
[3] Rowlands, I.H., B.P. Kemery, and I. Beausoleil-Morrison, Optimal solar-PV tilt angle and azimuth: An Ontario (Canada) case-study. Energy Policy, 2011. 39(3): p. 1397-1409.
[4] Banerjee. R. (2015). Solar Tracking System. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 5(3), 1-7.
[5] Mousazadeh, H., et al., A review of principle and sun-tracking methods for maximizing solar systems output. Renewable and sustainable energy reviews, 2009. 13(8): p. 1800-1818.
[6] Duffie, J.A. and W.A. Beckman, Solar engineering of thermal processes. 2013: John Wiley & Sons.
[7] Elghamry, R., et al. Effect of the PV position and orientation on energy consumption in a facility. in 2018 5th International Conference on Renewable Energy: Generation and Applications (ICREGA). 2018. IEEE.
[8] Soulayman, S., Optimum Tilt Angle and Maximum Possible Solar Energy Gain at High Latitude Zone. Journal of Solar Energy Research, 2016. 1(2): p. 25-35.
[9] Haysom, J.E., K. Hinzer, and D. Wright, Impact of electricity tariffs on optimal orientation of photovoltaic modules. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and applications, 2016. 24(2): p. 253-260.
[10] Mubarak, R., E. Weide Luiz, and G. Seckmeyer, Why PV modules should preferably no longer be oriented to the south in the near future. Energies, 2019. 12(23): p. 4528.
[11] Hummon, M., P. Denholm, and R. Margolis, Impact of photovoltaic orientation on its relative economic value in wholesale energy markets. Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, 2013. 21(7): p. 1531-1540.
[12] MacDougall, H., S. Tomosk, and D. Wright, Geographic maps of the impact of government incentives on the economic viability of solar power. Renewable Energy, 2018. 122: p. 497-506.
[13] Litjens, G., E. Worrell, and W. Van Sark, Influence of demand patterns on the optimal orientation of photovoltaic systems. Solar Energy, 2017. 155: p. 1002-1014.
[14] Kordvani, A. Hassan, M. Dalton, L. Berenjforoush, P. (2016) Renewable energy in Iran. CMS Cameron McKenna LLP, London.
[15] Khattak. M, Ashraff. M, Syafiq. A, Hazritz, M. (2016). Common Types of Fuels in Steam Power Plant: A Review. Journal of Advanced Research in Fluid Mechanics and Thermal Sciences, 23(1), 1-24.
[16] Steen, M. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Fossil Fuel Fired Power Generation Systems. EUROPEAN COMMISSION, JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE report (DG JRC). 1-61.
[17] Ahmed, W., et al., Impact of PV system orientation angle accuracy on greenhouse gases mitigation. Case Studies in Thermal Engineering, 2021. 23: p. 100815.
[18] Farangi, M. Soleimani, E. Zahedifar, M. Amiri, O. Poursafar, J. (2020). The environmental and economic analysis of grid-connected photovoltaic power systems with silicon solar panels, in accord with the new energy policy in Iran. Energy, 202, 1-8.
[19] Ahmed, W., et al., The role of single end-users and producers on GHG mitigation in Pakistan—a case study. Sustainability, 2020. 12(20): p. 8351.
[20] Shiravi, A. Firoozzadeh, M. (2019). Energy Payback Time and Environmental Assessment on a 7 MW PV plant in Hamedan province, Iran. Journal of Solar Energy Research, 4(4), 280-286.
[21] Planning and Macroeconomics of Electricity and Energy office, “Energy Balance Sheet of year 1398.”  2019.
[22] Suntech module catalogue. (2022). 455watt Ultra S STPXXXS -B72/Pnh+ 435-455W Monocrystalline solar module.
[23] SMA. Performance ratio-Quality factor for the PV plant. 1(1),1-9.
[24] Solaymani, S. (2021). A Review on Energy and Renewable Energy Policies in Iran. Sustainability, 13(13), 1-12.
[25]https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.phphttps://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/co2_vol_mass.php
[26] Attia. B, Parikh. M, Heggarty. T. (2017). Global Solar Demand Monitor. GTM research. 1-15.
Journal of Solar Energy Research
Volume 8, Issue 1
January 2023
Pages 1264-1273

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics