Meta-heuristic Optimization of the Neuro-Fuzzy MPPT Controller for PV Systems Under Partial Shading Conditions

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Physics, Faculty of Sciences, The University of Ngaoundere, Cameroon

2 Department of Physics, Higher Teacher Training College of Bertoua, The University of Bertoua, Cameroon

10.22059/jser.2022.349012.1255

Abstract

The main challenge of photovoltaic (PV) systems is to extract the maximum power from the array, especially when it is partially shaded and subjected to variable weather conditions (sunshine and temperature). To address this challenge, this manuscript proposes a new method based on the Neuro-Fuzzy- Particle Swarm Optimization (NF-PSO) combination. The NF method is used here because it allows an automatic generation of fuzzy rules, and we inject the PSO meta-heuristic at the input of the Neuro-fuzzy to find an optimal gain allowing not only to convert the real input values into fuzzy quantities and to readjust the dynamics of the fuzzy rules by reducing the power losses (oscillations), this combination also provides a simple and robust MPPT scheme to manage efficiently the partial shading, and its convergence to the global maximum power point (GMPP) is independent of the initial conditions of the search process. To confirm the NF-PSO as a viable MPPT option a comprehensive evaluation is performed against two other methods, namely the cuckoo algorithm and the original Neuro-Fuzzy. The simulation results of the system confirmed the better performance of this method in terms of speed with a response time of 0.044s, efficiency with 99.94%, and especially in terms of oscillation reduction with practically a negligible oscillation rate compared to the NF and the Cuckoo algorithm.

Keywords

References

[1] Krishna, K..S. and Kumar, K..S. (2015). A review on hybrid energy systems. Renewable and Sustainable Energy,Reviews, 52, 907 – 916.
[2] Jubaer A. and Zainal S.A. (2014). Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) for PV system using Cuckoo Search with partial shading capability. Applied Energy, 119, 118–130.
[3] Trihah E. and Patrick Chapman L. (2007).  Comparison of Photovoltaic Array Maximum Power Point Tracking Techniques. IEEE trans. Energy Convers, 22, 439–449.
[4] Loubna B., Mohammed H., Bekkay H. and Hicham B. A (2017). New MPPT-based ANN for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions.  Energy Procedia , 111, 924 – 933.
[5] Cyrus M. and Fazel M. (2019). Design and Analysis of a Stand-Alone Photovoltaic System for Footbridge Lighting. Journal of Solar Energy Research Spring,  4(2), 85-91.
[6] Smail C., Saad M., Aboubakr El H., Aissa C., Abou S.B., Abdelaziz E.G., Aziz Derouich, Mohamed A. and Askar S. S. (2022). A novel hybrid GWO–PSO‑based maximum power point tracking for photovoltaic systems operating under partial shading conditions. Scientifc Reports, 12:10637.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022 14733-6
[7] Makhloufi S. and Mekhilef S. (2022).  Logarithmic PSO-based global/local maximum power point tracker for partially shaded photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron,,  10. 1. 375–386.
[8] Ibrahim S., Pei C.C., Dawit F.T., Ramadhani K.S., Kuo L.L., And Jia-Fu L. (2022). An Enhanced Grey Wolf Optimization Algorithm for Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Control Under Partial Shading Conditions. Industrial Electronics Society, 3, 392-408.
[9] Ma X., Jiandong D., Xiao W., Tuo C., Yanhang W., and Ting C. (2018).  Research of photovoltaic systems MPPT based on im proved grey wolf algorithm under partial shading conditions. in Proc. 2nd IEEE Conf. Energy Internet Energy Syst. Integration, DOI: 10.1109/EI2.2018.8582098, 1–6.
[10] Guo K., Cui L., Mao M., Zhou L., and Zhang Q. (2020). An improved gray wolf optimizer MPPT algorithm for PV system with BFBIC converter under partial shading. IEEE Access, 8, 103476–103490.
[11] Eltamaly A. M. and Farh H. M. H. (2019). Dynamic global maximum power point tracking of the PV systems under variant partial shading using hybrid GWO-FLC. Sol. Energy, 177. 306–316.
 [12] Femia N., Petrone G., Spagnuolo G., and Vitelli M. (2005). Optimization of Perturb and Observe Maximum Power Point Tracking Method. IEEE Trans. Aerospace .Electro systems, 20. 4. 963–973.
[13] Safari A.  and Mekhilef S. (2011).  Simulation and Hardware Implementation of Incremental Conductance MPPT With Direct Control Method Using Cuk Converter. IEEE Trans. Indus. Electron, 58( 4), 1154–1161.
[14] Premkumar M., Umashankar S., Thanikanti S., Sanjevikumar P., Jens B., Mssimo M., and Sowmya R. (2021). Improved perturb observation maximum power point tracking technique for solar photovoltaic power generation systems. IEEE Syst. J., 15(2), 3024–3035.
[15] Bayata P. and Baghramian A. (2019). A High Efficiency On-board Charger for Solar Powered Electric Vehicles Using a Novel Dual-output DC-DC Converter. Journal of Solar Energy Research, Spring, 4(2), 128-141.
[16] Kitmo, Guy B. T., Dieudonné K. K., Sadam A., and Noël D. (2021). Optimization of the Smart Grids Connected using an Improved P&O MPPT Algorithm and Parallel Active Filters. Journal of Solar Energy Research, Summer  6(3), 814-828.
[17] Claude Bertin N., Fapi, Martin Kamta, and Patrice Wira. (2019). A comprehensive assessment of MPPT algorithms to optimal power extraction of a PV panel. Journal of Solar Energy Research, Summer  4(3), 172-179.
[18] Killi M. and Samanta S. (2015). Modified perturb and observe MPPT algorithm for drift avoidance in photovoltaic systems. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron, 62(9), 5549–5559.
[19] Alajmi B. N., Ahmed K. H., Finney S. J., and Williams B. W. (2011). Fuzzy-logic-control approach of a modified hill-climbing method for  maximum power point in microgrid standalone photovoltaic system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 26(4), 1022–1030.
[20] Tey K. S.  and  Mekhilef S. (2014).  Modified incremental conductance algorithm for photovoltaic system under partial shading conditions and load variation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., 61(10), 5384–5392.
[21] Özgür C.  and Ahmet T. (2017). A Hybrid MPPT method for grid connected photovoltaic systems under rapidly changing atmospheric conditions. Electric Power Systems Research, 152, 194–210.
[22] Alireza. R, Ali. E, Hasan. E and Mohammad. M. (2017). Intelligent hybrid power generation system using new hybrid fuzzy-neural for photovoltaic system and RBFNSM for Wind turbine in the grid connected mode. Front. Energy, DOI: 10.1007/s11708-017-0446-x.
[23] Alireza Z., Iman S., and Bahador F., (2021). A Partial Shading Detection Algorithm for Photovoltaic Generation Systems. Journal of Solar Energy Research, Winter  6(1), 678-687.
[24] Ahmad. R, Hossein. K. and Mahdi. M. (2013). A Comprehensive Method for Optimum Sizing of Hybrid Energy Systems using Intelligence Evolutionary Algorithms. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 6 (6),  0974-6846.
[25] Shams I., Mekhilef S., and Tey K. S. (2021). Maximum power point tracking using modified butterfly optimization algorithm for partial shading, uniform shading, and fast varying load conditions. IEEE Trans. Power Electron., 36(5), 5569–5581.
[26] Raeisi H. A.  and Sadeghzadeh S. M. (2019). Designing and Construction of a Solar Panel Simulator Capable of simulating partial shading conditions. Journal of Solar Energy Research, 4(1), 15-21.
[27] Mazaheri Salehi P. and Solyali D. (2018). A review on maximum power point tracker methods and their applications. Journal of Solar Energy Research,  3(2), 123-133.
[28] Venkateswari R., and Sreejith S. (2019).  Factors influencing the efficiency of photovoltaic system. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 101, 376–394  
[29] Oulcaid M., El Fadil H., Yaliya A., and Giri F. (2016).  Maximum power point tracking algorithm for photovoltaic systems under partial shaded conditions. IFAC-paperOnline, 49(13), 217-222.
[30] Syafaruddin Karatepe E., Hiyama T. (2009). Artificial neural network-polar coordinated fuzzy controller based maximum power point tracking control under partially shaded conditions. IET Renew Power Gener, 3, 239–53.
[31] Mostefa K. and El Madjid. B. (2017). Artificial intelligence-based maximum power point   tracking controllers for Photovoltaic systems: Comparative study. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69. 369–386.
[32] Premkumar M.  and Sowmya R. (2019). An effective maximum power point tracker for partially shaded solar photovoltaic systems. Energy Reports, 5, 1445–1462.
[33] Jyh-Shing Roger Jang. (1993). ANFIS: Adaptive-Network-Based Fuzzy Inference System. IEEE Transactions on systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 23( 3), 665-685.
[34] Vlachos D. and Tolias Y. A. (2003). Neuro-Fuzzy modeling in bankruptcy prediction. Yugoslav Journal of operations Research,  2, 165-174.
[35] Chiou, J.S. and Liu, M.T. (2009). Numerical simulation for Fuzzy-PID controllers and helping EP Reproduction with PSO hybrid algorithm, Simulation. Modelling Practice and Theory,  17, 1555–1565.
[36] Bouarroudj, N., Boukhetala, D. and Boudjema, F. (2014). Tuning Fuzzy PDα sliding mode controller using PSO algorithm for trajectory tracking of a chaotic system. Journal of Electrical Engineering, 14(2), 378–385.
[37] Bouarroudj, N., Boukhetala, D. and Boudjema, F. (2015). A hybrid fuzzy fractional order PID Sliding-Mode controller design using PSO algorithm for interconnected Nonlinear Systems. Journal of Control Engineering and Applied Informatics,  17(1), 41–51.
[38] Abdelhalim B., Noureddine B., Abdelhak B. and Layachi Z. (2017). P&O-PI and fuzzy-PI MPPT Controllers and their time domain optimization using PSO and GA for grid-connected photovoltaic system: a comparative study. International Journal of Power Electronics, 8(4).  300-322.
Journal of Solar Energy Research
Volume 8, Issue 1
January 2023
Pages 1222-1234

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics