<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>University of Tehran</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Solar Energy Research</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>2588-3097</Issn>
				<Volume>11</Volume>
				<Issue>3</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2026</Year>
					<Month>07</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Impact of Ground Albedo on Monofacial and Bifacial PV Modules: A PVsyst-Based Performance Evaluation under South Indian Climate</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle></VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>3937</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>3951</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">107928</ELocationID>
			
<ELocationID EIdType="doi">10.22059/jser.2026.408422.1690</ELocationID>
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Dinesh</FirstName>
					<LastName>Manickam</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Adhi College of Engineering and Technology, Kanchipuram, India</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8461-790X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Vijayaprabhu</FirstName>
					<LastName>Arumugam</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Siddharth Institute of Engineering and Technology, Puttur, India</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-8728-7862</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Thangalakshmi</FirstName>
					<LastName>Sivalingam</LastName>
<Affiliation>School of Marine Engineering and Technology, Indian maritime University, Maharashtra, India</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-4523-9210</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Bhaskar</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kosuru Bojji Raju</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Adhi College of Engineering and Technology, Kanchipuram, India</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0003-2464-4110</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Dinesh Babu</FirstName>
					<LastName>Kesavan</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Adhi College of Engineering and Technology, Kanchipuram, India</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0001-7285-170X</Identifier>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>Abhishek</FirstName>
					<LastName>Agarwal</LastName>
<Affiliation>Department of Energy Technology, Tallinn University of Technology, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia</Affiliation>
<Identifier Source="ORCID">0000-0002-0900-6383</Identifier>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
			<History>
				<PubDate PubStatus="received">
					<Year>2025</Year>
					<Month>12</Month>
					<Day>19</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</History>
		<Abstract>This investigation evaluates the influence of rooftop reflectance on the performance of mono- and bifacial photovoltaic systems using a PVsyst-based simulation of a 125 kWp rooftop installation under tropical climatic conditions in southern India. Both photovoltaic technologies were analysed using identical electrical and geometric configurations so that rooftop albedo remained the only varying parameter. A reference albedo of 0.30 was considered for both technologies, while enhanced albedo scenarios of 0.50, 0.60, and 0.85 were evaluated for bifacial modules. Simulation results show that the monofacial system operating at an albedo of 0.30 generated 188.45 MWh/year with a performance ratio (PR) of 83.76%, whereas the bifacial configuration under identical conditions produced 187.11 MWh/year. As the rooftop albedo increased, the annual energy yield of the bifacial system increased to 187.86, 188.23, and 189.16 MWh/year for albedo values of 0.50, 0.60, and 0.85, respectively. This improvement was accompanied by a marginal reduction in PR from 83.17% to 82.83%, primarily due to higher operating temperatures associated with increased rear-side irradiance. The analysis further identifies an albedo-dependent performance transition threshold between 0.60 and 0.85, beyond which bifacial modules provide superior annual energy performance compared with monofacial modules.</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ground reflectivity</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Rear-side irradiance</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Albedo transition threshold</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">performance ratio</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Cool roof strategy</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Energy yield modeling</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jser.ut.ac.ir/article_107928_4621550e81781ae69f07b7427596e876.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
